Sustainable Livelihoods

Jakarta, 15 to 17 January 2002

Interregional Consultative Expert Meeting
on disability-sensitive policy design and evaluation
for sustainable livelihoods for all in the twenty-first century

Hosted by WorldEnable homeSeminars   |  Resources   |  About

 Home|  Overview|  Programme|  Participants|  Papers|  Resources|

 

Disability-Sensitive Policy Design And Evaluation For Sustainable Livelihoods For All In The Twenty-First Century: Hong Kong Experience in a Changing Regional Context

Joseph Kwok

Part 5 of 6 | Previous | Next
Go to other parts: 1 2 3 4 5 6

SECTION FIVE
NEW INITIATIVES AND EMERGING CRITICAL CHALLENGES:
HONG KONG AND THE ASIA AND PACIFIC REGION

EMERGING CRITICAL CHALLENGES IN HONG KONG

The Hong Kong economy, like similar economies in the Region, has encountered critical hardships, including accelerated economic downturn, a rise in unemployment, an increase in the fiscal deficit and a delayed recovery. All these have happened since the Asian financial crisis which started in May 1997 from Thailand, deflated the bubble economy, and has changed the way people spend and invest their money.  The terrorist attacks on the United States on 11 September 2001 have further dampened export markets and consumer spending. The situation has become even more complex because of the transformations happening in both the world’s and Hong Kong’s economy. The world is rapidly transforming from an industrial economy to a knowledge-based economy. Globalisation has also brought about tremendous challenges and opportunities.

NEW INITIATIVES

Strengthening policy commitments at times of economic uncertainty

In order to deal with the emerging critical challenges, Hong Kong Government has strengthened its policy commitments to enable socially disadvantaged groups to access opportunities for economic and social participation. For 2001 budget, Government proposed to spend HK$30.2 billion on recurrent welfare services, which is 13.8% of total recurrent public expenditure, and in real terms, a 9.3% increase over 2000 budget. Against a background of tight government spending, rehabilitation services on the other hand have received considerable attention in the Budget. To provide greater support for people with disabilities, Government has earmarked HK$219 million in 2001/2 to implement a package of measures to address their day-care, residential and employment needs. Taken with new resources already earmarked, an additional 5,100 day and residential places will be provided over the next 5 years. In addition, innovative employment assistance packages including on-the-job training programmes and seed money for NGOs to create new employment opportunities will be funded (Tsang, 2001).

A seed fund to create employment opportunities for PWD

The 2001 Budget has a one-off provision of HK$50 million for non-government organisations to create employment opportunities for the disabled. NGOs for and of PWD have submitted quite a range of proposals before the deadline of December 2001 for implementation by mid 2002.

Special Fund to support disabled athletes

The 2001 Budget created a special grant of HK$50 million to provide subsidies for disabled athletes and to help them find employment at the end of their athletic careers.

The Chief Executive’s policy speech in 2001 launched two further new initiatives, which would benefit also PWD (Tung, 2001). They are Community Investment and Inclusion Fund and Continuing Education Fund.

Continuing Education Fund

The Government has set aside HK$5 billion to subsidise those with learning aspirations to pursue continuing education and training programmes, to prepare for the challenges in knowledge-based economy.

Community Investment and Inclusion Fund

The Government has recognized that current economic restructuring will result in some profound adjustments in our society, and considers it necessary to strengthen grassroots’ initiatives, and to support people’s spirit of self-help and mutual aid. To support and promote social capital at the grassroots level, the Government provides an initial $300 million grant to establish a ‘Community Investment and Inclusion Fund’. The objective of the Fund is to encourage mutual concern and aid among people, and to promote community participation in district and cross-sector programmes. The Fund serves as a catalyst to enhance social cohesion, strengthen community networks, and support families more effectively.

Details of the two funding schemes are expected to be announced by mid 2002. It is expected that PWD is among the priority sectors that would benefit from these new Funds.

SOME THOUGHTS ABOUT DISABILITY MOVEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY

The critical challenges that Hong Kong is facing are not unique in the Region. Moreover there are also other challenges which are affecting the disability sector. There are now active government reforms across the Region towards down sizing, involvement of the private sector in public services, devolution of central power to local governments. Issues concerning elderly, women, young people are going to attract priority attention in government agenda, as they are generally perceived to have direct links to national security.

In spite of the many critical challenges facing governments and people of Asia and the Pacific Region, there are also signs of positive development.

First, United Nations General Assembly in its November 2001 meeting approved in principle an international convention on the rights of PWD, and the setting up of an ad hoc committee to coordinate the drafting tasks.

Second, UN ESCAP and Regional Networks concerning disabilities have unanimously supported an extension of  the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 1993-2202, and the themes and agenda for action of the new Decade will be adopted in a senior governmental meeting organized by UNESCAP in Japan in October 2002.

Third, global institutions like International Monetary Fund, World Bank and Asian Development Bank have taken on more proactive roles in poverty eradication, and inclusion of poverty, gender and security issues in general development programmes, especially macro economic development planning.

Fourth, there are also signs that global private foundations and donor agencies are seeking network relationships with the disability sector. The International Working Group on Disability Concerns, of which Rehabilitation International is serving as a secretary, is an example of international loose networks with donor agencies at the global level.   Japan International Cooperation Agency participated in the network for the first time in 2000, and would continue to take part in 2001. 

Fifth, regional cooperation through a diversity of channels is progressing with more positive signs seen in mainstream sectors, for example:

  • Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation – e.g. has set up special funds to support ICT and disability issues
  • Association of Southeast Asian Nations + China - Free economic zone to be realized within 15 years
  • Asia Europe Meeting Trust Fund coordinated by World Bank
  • Multi-sectional initiative within UN ESCAP, e.g. in research and statistics and transport mainstream sectors
  • World Trade Organization: poverty issues will be given more attention plus also social issues; facilitating more people movement across country borders which would have an impact on country disability population trends; growing demands on multi-national corporations to adopt same labour practices concerning disability, which in turn will become models for national corporations through public education or demand for fair play in world trading.

What should be appropriate strategic moves for the First New Millennium Decade?

  • Be much more focused in advocating for affirmative disability policies by selecting only a few key strategic areas, e.g. barrier free environment, education and training, employment, quality of life of PWD and their families.
  • More emphasis on legislative measures and their implementation, and grounding this key area on human rights principles.
  • To further strengthen regional cooperation, supporting UNESCAP and its thematic working group, and open up the work of UNESCAP to influence other regional platforms, some of them are identified above.  The voice of disability concerned groups should be facilitated in all those mainstream forums, and UNESCAP should be urged to take a proactive role by inviting representative of these forums in, or reaching out to these forums, through active cooperation with the INGO sectors. UN mainstream sectors should be asked to develop disability related global indices, such as disability related quality of life index, and human resources index.
  • Promoting cooperation at sub regional levels to continue identifying and promoting best practices in GO, NGO and private sectors in key areas. To continue leadership training for people with disabilities and their advocates, with a focus at sub national level to cooperate with mayors or provincial or city governors. To create regional platforms for local government leaders to exchange their views on disability policies, and to create a platform of dialogue between these leaders and the regional disability networks. Affirmative legislation and regulations could also be more effectively implemented through an involved and active decentralized government structure.
  • As a long-term strategy, both GOs and NGOs should incorporate into their national human resources programmes concrete plans to nurture young people, including young PWD to take part in regional activities. UN ESCAP would have a strategic role in continuing with its training program for young people with disabilities as trainers. We have heard too often from young people with disabilities whom we met at the previous campaign conferences that many pressing issues have restrained them from learning how to start activities or projects.  The post Decade years should identify ways that experienced people and organizations could provide technical support more as partners with those young people who have a will to improve their life situations.
  • At national and sub national levels, organizations of and for PWD should strengthen solidarity and improve network relation with other major actors in GO and civic society, and mainstream disability issues in general sectors and other special sector e.g. elderly & women.
  • Disability networks at national levels and international levels to achieve more cooperation, and helping each other through bilateral or multi-lateral cooperation projects. This is a useful way to sensitize people in developed economies, sowing seeds in affecting multi-national corporations as well as inter-governmental forums.  Such cooperation should better take the form of small-scale development grants working in partnership with local networks, to achieve more project numbers in a wider coverage of various geographical locations, so as to pose fewer burdens on infrastructure investment and their maintenances.

THANK YOU

Return to top


Copyright (c) 2002 WorldEnable

Last updated 11/02/03.