Poverty Alleviation and Persons with Disabilities

UN ESCAP/CDPF Field Study cum Regional Workshop
on Poverty Alleviation among Persons with Disabilities

Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China, 25-29 October 2004

 Main| Programme| Materials| Online| Lanzhou| WorldEnable home
Programme : Presentation on Day 1

Tools for effective evaluation of disability impact, including disability sensitivity tool, disability impact analysis and disability budgeting

Presented by Kay Nagata
Disability Focal Point
UN ESCAP


Slide 1

UN ESCAP/CDPF Field Study cum Regional Workshop
on Poverty Alleviation among Persons with Disabilities
Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China, 25-29 October 2004

Tools for effective evaluation of disability impact, including disability sensitivity tool, disability impact analysis and disability budgeting

By Kay Nagata, UNESCAP


2

Poverty and disability (dynamism)

Graphic of a cycle:

  • Underdevelopment / Insufficient infrastructure
  • Low level of economic development / Poverty
  • Mal-nutrition / Insecurity / Terrorism / Civil Conflict
  • Disability / Insufficient Services
  • Impairment / Low Production / Lack of Human Resource Development

3

Two main paradigms

  • Development model: Twin track approach (disability integration into mainstream projects, CBR, poverty alleviation, MDG goals, etc.)
  • Human rights- based approach: The Convention for PWD, national laws, self-help groups, shift from medical model to social model, etc.;

4

Disability and Development: Towards a Global Strategy

  • Disability and development policies: Bilateral agencies: USAID, NORD, JICA, British DFID;
  • Multilateral agencies: World Bank, ADB, etc.
  • INGOS: Save the Children
  • Mainstreaming disability in development projects;
  • DFID paper on “Disability, poverty and development”; Sida paper; NORD paper on disability and development, Jica effort, etc.

5

Twin Track Approach of disability and development

  • Disability mainstreaming: disability as cross-cutting issues; enhanced by social model of disability;

  • Disability blindness just like gender blindness;

  • “Twin Track Approach” (just like gender) of disability mainstreaming and empowerment of PWD;

  • Empowerment through CBR, capacity building, rehabilitation, training, etc.


6

Strategies for disability integration and assessment of disability impact

  • Active participation of PWD at all levels (planning, designing, implementation, monitoring, evaluation) of development projects;

  • Cross-sectoral approach;

  • Working together with DPOs and NGOs;

  • Disability sensitivity training of ODA workers and project staff;

  • Development of an effective “disability impact assessment tool” and evaluation mechanism;

  • Disability budgeting.


7

Disability Integration (some examples)

  • For infrastructure projects: Use of barrier-free and “universal design”;
  • Mainstreaming of PWD in training programmes (how many disabled people, if not why not?);
  • Recruitment of disabled staff in development agencies;
  • In-house staff training on disability sesitivity;
  • Barrier-free training curriculum (e.g. Braille, computer Braille, accessible on-line information, accessible digital information, etc.);
  • Promotion of inclusive education or disabled children (how many disabled children will benefit from the project?).

8

Empowerment of PWD (some examples)

  • Support to self-help groups, DPOs, etc.;
  • Rehabilitation (all kinds of rehabilitation projects, medical, vocational, social, etc.);
  • Lobbying skills and advocacy;
  • CBR and other community-based projects for PWD and independent living projects.

9

Some assessment tools

  • Is the project related to PWD? “ --- YES” for projects related to public transportation, buildings, small scale business, rural development and social welfare and social services, etc;
  • To what extent is the project related to disabled persons (particular impact such as medical services, as much as other people, indirectly, etc. by different degrees)?
  • Are PWD participating in the planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation process?
  • Is the project in accordance with the international norms and standards (WPA, the Standard Rules, the Convention, etc.)?

10

Some assessment tools (continues)

  • Is the project has any specific measures to guarantee the benefit of PWD as beneficiaries and stakeholders?
  • Accessibility, equality, safety, affordability, reachability,usability, workability, and orientation;
  • No minus impact of the project on PWD?
  • Any scope of sustainability of the project?
  • In the project document, was “disability impact” assessed?
  • Is the disability impact assessment included in the final evaluation process, and if so, who is participating in the process.

11

ODA policy check list

  • Is there any official disability integration policy of a development agency?
  • Is the policy adopting the internationally recognized norms (e.g. ICF, the standard rules, WPA, BMF, etc.)?;
  • What is the overall coverage (%) of disability integration of all projects?
  • What is the monitoring mechanism of checking disability integration.

12

Disability budgeting

  • Disability budgeting vs gender budgeting:
  • Head-counting of beneficiaries;
  • What is the total budget allocated for the benefit of PWD in the project (e.g. ILO project in Cambodia, 5% of trainees was disabled trainees);
  • Is the any additional specific allocation for promotion of disability integration (e.g. with additional budget for PWD, the ratio of disabled trainees  was increased to 15 % in the Cambodia project).

13

Thank you

Return to top


Copyright (c) 2004 Vision Office.
Last updated 09/02/04. Contact: info @ visionoffice.com