Skip Navigation
CBR and Poverty Alleviation of PWDs

Workshop on Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) and Poverty Alleviation of Persons with Disabilities
Bangkok, 5 July 2005

Main| Programme| Materials| Online| Bangkok| WorldEnable home
Programme : Agenda 3 :

Microfinance in reducing poverty and vulnerability: its possible role in empowering persons with disability

Presented by
UN ESCAP


Slide 1

Microfinance in reducing poverty and vulnerability:
its possible role in empowering persons with disability

Workshop on Community-based Rehabilitation (CBR) and Poverty Alleviation of Persons with Disabilities
5 July 2005
UN ESCAP Secretariat


2

ORIGIN OF MICROFINANCE MOVEMENT IN BANGLADESH

  • Began in Bangladesh with Grameen Project in 1976
  • BRAC, ASA and PROSHIKA followed by incorporating “Grameen-model” of group-based credit in their activities
  • Hundreds of small NGOs followed Grameen-model

3

ORIGIN OF MICROFINANCE MOVEMENT IN BANGLADESH

  • Today there are 1200 microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Bangladesh
  • The “Big Four” (e.g., GB, BRAC, ASA, and PROSHIKA) account for 90 percent of micro-credit borrowers in Bangladesh
  • Latest estimates (June 2004) suggest that there are 13.7 million MFI members in Bangladesh

4

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
STATIC MODEL

  • Mid-70s to end 1980: a period of learning and horizontal expansion
  • A few years went into developing the “basic model”
  • Group of 5

5

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
STATIC MODEL (cont’d)

  • Ceiling on land as membership criterion
  • A ceiling on the maximum amount lent
  • Group savings
  • Fixed installments spread over 50 weeks
  • Traditional activities financed

6

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
STATIC MODEL (cont’d)

  • Housing loan part of the package
  • Standardized branches were added horizontally
  • As end-1980s approached, horizontal expansion around branch-franchising slowed down

7

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
DYNAMIC MODEL

  • Shift from group responsibility to individual responsibility
  • Greater managerial responsibility devolved to branch managers
  • Greater accountability for performance

8

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
DYNAMIC MODEL (cont’d)

  • Performance criterion established around an “index” of profitability and social indicators
  • A diversified product-range
  • Diversified savings/withdrawal options

9

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
DYNAMIC MODEL (cont’d)

  • Loan repayment period made more flexible in line with the nature of economic activity financed
  • Individual loans ceiling removed
  • Enterprise loans introduced

10

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
DYNAMIC MODEL (cont’d)

  • Special interest-free loans introduced (e.g., loans to beggars)
  • Scholarships for the children of members introduced
  • Education Loans Fund
  • Health Insurance Scheme introduced

11

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
DYNAMIC MODEL (cont’d)

  • Pension scheme introduced
  • Shift from donor-financing to bond-financing
  • Savings ploughed back as loans
  • Big 4 completely self-reliant for lending resources

12

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
IMPACT

  • Mixed evidence on the impact for reducing income poverty
  • Using WB survey data, one study shows a decline in income poverty

13

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
IMPACT (cont’d)

  • Using the same data, another study shows no appreciable impact
  • Difference lies in the methodology
  • More recent studies conducted by BIDS show sharp decrease in income poverty of the borrowers
  • Macroeconomic effect uncertain

14

JOURNEY FROM “STATIC MODEL” TO “DYNAMIC MODEL”
IMPACT (cont’d)

  • Empowerment of women: debate continues
  • Women are being empowered through access to finance at household level
  • Women are acquiring more assets (e.g., housing loan etc.)
  • But their attitude towards daughters’ education and marriage varies, benefits appropriation

15

MICROFINANCE AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITY: SOME CRITICAL ISSUES

  • Distinguish social welfare support for economically inactive group from productive support for economically active group
  • Concessionary arrangements e.g. no or reduced interest
  • Joint liability groups e.g. Associations of PWDs
  • Assistance with procuring/sourcing inputs, marketing products

16

MICROFINANCE AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITY: SOME CRITICAL ISSUES

  • Modification to group collateral modality e.g. individual loans, have one PWD per group
  • Explore use of ICT
  • Balance between financial sustainability and social goals
  • Further studies needed on microfinance methodologies for PWDs, and sharing good practices

Return to top


Copyright (c) 2005 Vision Office.
Last updated 02/27/05. Contact: info @ visionoffice.com