Programme :
Why the disability-inclusive approach is important?
By Prof. Kim Hyung Shik
Korean Society for Rehabilitation of Persons with Disability
Text version of a PowerPoint presentation
Slide 1
UN ESCAP Regional Workshop on Comprehensive National Plan of Action on
Disability - Towards the Mid-point Review of the Biwako Millennium Framework
for Action Bangkok, 19-21 October 2005
Why the disability-inclusive approach is important?
By Prof. Kim Hyung Shik
Korean Society for Rehabilitation of Persons with Disability
2
- To locate Disability Development in the context of Economic
Developments
- DID Framework Presented
3 & 4
Disability Agenda and Economic development Models
Agenda for Disability Development
|
|
Agenda for Economic Developments
|
|
1 |
1971, Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons (UN) |
1 |
1960~70 The First decade od
UN Development |
|
2 |
1970~80 The Second Decade
of UN Development |
|
2 |
1975 Declarations on the Rights of Disabled Persons (UN) |
3 |
1980s Era of Social Development |
|
4 |
New International Economic Order |
|
3 |
1981 International year of Disabled Persons (UN) |
5 |
Development with Human Face
From Redistribution after
Growth to Redistribution with
Growth
Meeting Human Needs |
|
4 |
1982 World Programme of Action Concerning Disabled persons (UN) |
|
5 |
1983-1992, Decade of Disabled Persons (UN) |
6 |
1985 Copenhagen Social Summit |
|
6 |
3 December, 1992 International Day of Disabled Persons |
7 |
The Lost Decade of Development |
|
7 |
1993, UN Standard Rules on the equalization of Opportunities for Persons
with Disabilities |
8 |
1990s Sustainable Economic & Social Development |
|
9 |
The Decade of Broken Promises |
|
8 |
2002~UN Convention on Disability Rights |
10 |
2000. MDGs |
|
9 |
BMF/Osaka Declaration |
11 |
2002 Development Summit |
5
Arnstein's Ladder of Participation
d
6
d
7
Table 1. Distribution of Disability Population
| |
Thousands (000) |
| Asia |
367,580(60%) |
| Africa |
81,247(13%) |
| Europe |
72,846(12%) |
| Latin America |
52,923(9%) |
| North America |
31,497(5%) |
| Pacific & Oceania |
3,095(1%) |
Source: UN Population Division, World Population Prospects: 2004
Revision
8 & 9
C-1 Political Prerequisites
|
|
Political Strategies |
Check-list/indices for as seen from BMF[8]
|
|
1 |
Areas for co-operation |
a) Increase the level of consultations between PWD’s SHOs and diverse
sectoral ministries, civil societies & private sector. b). |
|
2 |
Areas for campaign |
a) Action to increase representation of PWDs in all areas of public
life. b). Rights for decent work, education, & health. |
|
3 |
Areas for contest |
a) Maximum grass-roots participation of PWDs. b) Inclusion of PWDs for
economic mainstream |
|
4 |
Identify potential/new actors/stakeholders |
a) Formation of parents associations at local levels by 2005, at the
national level by 2010. |
|
5 |
Identify areas for coalition/collaboration with DPOs/NGOs/civil society
|
a) Inclusion of PWDs in the decision-making processes. b) Ratify the
Vocational & Employment of Employment Convention by 2012. |
|
6 |
Legislative/policy development |
a) Establishment of a policy review panel. b) Anti-discrimination law.
|
10 & 11
C-2 Technological Prerequisites
|
|
Technological Strategies |
Check-list/indices |
|
1 |
Adoption of
Appropriate/Intermediate Technology |
a) Co-operative Development and Production. b) CBR. c) Adoption of
Universal and Inclusive designs. |
|
2 |
Empowerment |
a) Capacity-building for SHO.
b) Develop Indices for Self-determination, Self-respect, & creation
of equal opportunities for PWDs. b) Training for participative
development & decision-making. c) Training of PWDs for developmental
roles. b) De-centralize & de-professionalize development process. d)
Experts for Policy Making, Implementation and Evaluation, preferably
PWDs. e) Increase membership of mainstream gender organizations |
|
3 |
CBR |
a) Develop mechanisms for mutual support, advocacy & referral for rural
PWDs. b) Technical training for CBR. Leadership |
|
4 |
Develop Indices of feasible/adequate material standards of living |
a) Safety-nets and national minimum. b) Ensure self-sufficiency of
disabled households, local neighborhood, & regional economic
self-sufficiency |
12
C-3 Prerequisite for Resources
|
|
Resources Strategies |
Check-list/indices for |
|
1 |
Human, Material, Financial, & Political resources, including social
support |
a) Securing allocations from Govt. NGOs and International organizations.
|
|
2. |
Networking & Inter-Agency Collaboration |
a) Global-national funding bodies, eg). ODA, tapping foreign aids,
development grants, etc. b) Develop links with Social Enterprises/
Entrepreneurs. |
13
D-1
System Constrains
|
Cultural-Ideological Constraints |
Basic social and political values, willingness of the system to accept
DID, Public attitudes toward the people with disability |
|
Political Constraints |
Intra & Inter departmental power & authority:
- Heath and Social Affairs:
Welfare services, pension, social safety-nets
- Labor: Employment and
training
- Education.
- Law : Anti discrimination
legislation
- Transport and
Construction: Access and mobility, housing
- Economics: budgetary
allocations
|
|
Operational Constraints |
Attention to the inter-play of politics |
14 & 15
Table II-1 Expansion of Disability Categories & Minimum Living Standard
Protection
|
Objectives |
Areas for Implementation |
Checks |
|
Expansion of Disability categories |
Continuous Expansion
of Disability
Categories |
1. First stage expansion |
O |
|
2. Third stage expansion |
X |
|
3. Redefinition of ‘severe’ disability |
X |
|
Improving Disability Registration System |
4. Rational merging of overlapping
disability categories |
X |
|
5. Fair treatments for all types of
disabilities |
X |
|
6. Improvements in disability
assessments & registration
procedures |
X |
|
Minimum Living Standard Protection |
7. Introduction of disability pensions allowances
8. Minimum living protection for PWDs
9. Housing support |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
10. Child care |
O |
|
Tax Concessions |
11. Various concessions |
O |
|
12. Expansion of tax relief for PWDs |
X |
16-19
Table II-3 Disability Employment
|
Objectives |
Implementations |
Checks |
|
Disability Employments |
1) Expansion of compulsory employment (quota system) |
O |
|
-Expansion of target industries/employers
-Rationalization of exemptions by occupational categories |
O |
|
O |
|
2) Rational and flexible operations of quota system |
O |
|
- Differential
applications of penalties
- Introduction of
measures to improve employment of persons with severe disability - |
O |
|
X O |
|
3) Guidance for implementation of quota system |
O |
|
-Public sector guidance
-Private sector guidance |
O |
|
O |
|
Anti-discrimination and protection of women’s rights |
1) Enforcement of anti-discrimination measures |
O |
|
2) Strengthening of site inspections for target industries |
X |
|
3) Protecting women’s right to work & creation of work opportunities
|
O. X |
|
Finding jobs in competitive open markets |
1) Diversification of occupational categories |
O |
|
2) Support for model industries for employing multiple number of workers
with disabilities |
O |
|
3) Creation and support for self-employment/business |
O |
|
Creation of jobs with value-added potentials |
1) Strengthening customized training |
O |
|
2) Disability-suited training |
O |
|
3) Training programs for people with advanced academic & intellectual
skills |
X |
|
4) Training quality improvement for rehabilitation centers and special
schools |
X |
|
5) Consolidating training role of the public training facilities |
O |
|
Matching Supply-Demand for Disability Employment |
1) Establishment and improvement of employment assessment centers |
O |
|
2) Improvements in job placement services |
O |
|
3) Strengthen pre & post employment support services |
X |
|
4) Deployment of disability intern services |
O |
|
Incentives for Employers |
1) Introduction of rewards systems |
O |
|
2) Support for re-employment of the injured workers |
X |
|
3) Financial support for modifications of work sites |
O |
|
4) Tax exemptions/concessions |
X |
|
Improving Policy Infrastructures |
1) Redefinition of Korea Employment Agency for Disabled Workers |
O |
|
2) Establishing linkages with causes of disability and vocational
services |
X |
|
3) Deployment of placement specialist and effective management |
O |
|
Securing
Funding/budgets |
1) General revenue from the Government |
O |
|
2) Social insurance component |
X |
|
3) Utilization of collected penalties |
O |
|
Improving welfare services for Persons With Disabilities
|
1) Expansion and systemization of sheltered workshops |
O |
|
2) Strengthening productive elements in vocational rehabilitation
centers & upgrading facilities |
O |
|
3) Individualized vocational training through vocational assessment |
O |
|
4) Initiating new projects to match the emerging disability areas and
employment support |
X |
|
5) Vocational rehabilitation specialist training and in-service training
|
O |
Enactment of the “Mobility Disadvantaged Persons’ Act” has been the focal
point in this aspect of policy, and qualitative and quantitative
developments are expected in 2006 when the Act will be implement in full
force. The development will include door-to door services as well as
‘accessible’ omni buses.
Table II-4 Access & Assistive technlogies
|
Objectives |
Implementation |
Checks |
|
Access Facilities& Barrier-free Environment |
1) Establish regional special transport unit |
X |
|
2) Improving access to urban train networks |
O |
|
3) Improving omnibus access for PWDs |
O |
|
4) Improving access at airport, train and greyhound terminals |
X |
|
5) Improving public transport information services |
X |
|
6) Improving pedestrian footpaths and licensing system |
X |
|
7) Improving access/transport regulations affecting PWDs |
O |
|
Development & Supplies of Assistive technologies |
1) Improving the quality of assistive devices |
O |
|
2) Improving manufacturing, delivery & services for Assistive devices
|
O |
|
3) Encouraging developments for AT/AD |
X |
|
Promotional Activities |
Establish comprehensive plan for action |
|
|
Professionalizing delivery of access services |
|
|
Plans for persons with hearing & visual disabilities |
|
|
Enhancing political participation |
|
20-21
Table II-5. Information Technology & ICT
|
Objectives |
Implementation |
Checks |
|
Advocacy for Importance of ICT |
ICT related public campaign |
O |
|
Publicity to encourage participation in ICT education |
O |
|
Promoting Participation through ICT |
Expansion of educational programmes |
O |
|
Expansion of distance education programmes |
X |
|
Intensification of personal support visits |
O |
|
Improving overall ICT Access and Environment |
Creation of IT based job opportunities |
X |
|
Expansion of IT competence certifications |
O |
|
Support for IT based business ventures |
O, X |
|
Establish IT research center |
X |
|
Standardization of Korean sign languages |
X |
|
Supply of IT terminals/hardwares |
O |
|
Support DPOs’ IT infrastructures |
O |
|
|
One stop services and expansion of portal sites |
O |
|
|
Commencement of text-based telephone services for the hard of hearing
and deaf persons |
O,X |
22-23
Table II-6. Early Intervention (Education)
|
Objectives |
Implementation |
Checks |
|
Educational Opportunities under
Inclusive |
Public images on disability & Assesment for Special Education
|
1) Public consciousness of disability |
0 |
|
2) Expansion of categories special education |
0 |
|
3) Systemaize early dection |
0 |
|
4) Development of diagnostic instruments for special education |
0 |
|
Gurantees for
Balanced Educational Opportunities |
1) Mobile services for early dection (homes, schools, care centers,
schools, etc) |
0 |
|
2) Expansion of support for early childhood education |
0 |
|
3) Support for families of child with disability |
0 |
|
4) Expansion of special school classes |
0 |
|
5) Expansion of special schools |
0 |
|
6) Reduction of student numbers in special school classes |
0 |
|
Environment |
Expansion of
inclusive
Education |
1) Diversification of operations of special schools |
0 |
|
2) Placement of special ed. teachers in normal schools |
x |
|
3) Improving access facilities in normal schools |
0 |
|
Tertiary Education |
1) Improving access at University campuses |
0 |
|
2) Disability support units in tertiary campuses |
0.x |
|
3) Expansion of opportunities for tertiary edu |
0 |
|
4) Expansion of continuing education |
|
Return to top
D-Links:
Arnstein's Ladder of
Participation. Picture of ladder with eight rungs. The bottom two rungs,
1 and 2 are Manipulation and Therapy, which are considered
non-participation. Rungs 3 to 5 are Informing, Consultation, and Placation,
which are considered Token Participation. The top rungs, 6 to 8 are
Partnership, Delegated power and Citizen control, which are considered
Citizen Participation.
Return to top
Framework of the DID. A complex
diagram. boxes showing social, political, demographic, economic and
cultural/regional contribute to A. Disability Issues. The issues box points
to the BMF Priorities for Inclusive, Barrier-free, Rights-based society.
This branches out to a "B" branch and a "C" branch. The B branch consists of
these boxes in sequence: SHO, Women, Early Intervention, Employment and
Training, Access to Env. Transport, Access to ICT, and Povery/Capacity-building.
The C branch consists of these boxes in sequence: DID Strategies, a.
Political Support, b. Technological, and c. Resources. Both B and C branches
are connected through an "interface". At the bottom of the diagram is D.
System Constraints, consisting of cultural, political/structural, and
operational constraints. The System constrains provide Feedback and
Monitoring for the BMF priorities.
Return to top |