International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

UN ESCAP/CDPF Regional Meeting on an International Convention on Disability
Beijing, China, 4-7 November 2003

 Main Programme Materials Online Beijing WorldEnable home
Home
Beijing Declaration
Final Report
Pre-Seminar
* Background
* Seminar Brief
* Participants:
* Review Paper
* Registration
* Hotel Reservation
* Getting to Beijing
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC
(ORGANIZED BY UNESCAP IN COLLABORATION WITH CHINA DISABLED PERSONS' FEDERATION)

Draft Report of Regional Meeting on an International Convention on Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities

Beijing, China
4-7 November 2003

This report has been issued without formal editing.

CONTENTS

I. SEMINAR OUTCOME

II PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEMINAR

  • Summary of presentations
  • Summary of discussions
  • Working Group discussions

III. ORGANIZATION OF THE SEMINAR

  • Background
  • Attendance
  • Opening of the Seminar
  • Adoption of the agenda
  • Adoption of the Declaration of Beijing on the Elaboration of an International Convention on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities

ANNEXES

Annex I: List of participants

Annex II: Programme of the Seminar

Annex III: Document list

Annex IV: Report of working groups

 

I. SEMINAR OUTCOME

Participants in the Regional Seminar on an International Convention on Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (Beijing, China 4-7 November 2003) adopted "Declaration of Beijing on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities' --- herein after the "Declaration of Beijing".

The Declaration of Beijing is a policy-oriented statement on the question of the elaboration of a comprehensive and integral convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, based on review of the existing regional documents developed by regional experts such as the Bangkok Draft [proposed elements of a comprehensive and integral convention to promote and protect the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities] and the Bangkok Recommendations. Furthermore, the Declaration of Beijing was to show a unified support for the process towards the Convention at the Asian and Pacific regional level.

bullet Beijing Declaration on Elaboration of an International Convention to Promote and Protect the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities

 


II. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEMINAR

The Seminar had a working paper and several key documents for its consideration including the following documents:

  1. Bangkok Draft (proposed elements of a comprehensive and integral convention to promote and protect the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities) developed by the experts who attended the Regional Workshop towards a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (Bangkok, 14-17 October 2003);
  2. A set of general recommendations adopted by the above Regional Workshop towards a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (Bangkok, 14-17 October 2003);
  3. "Bangkok Recommendations" --- Report of the Expert Group Meeting and Seminar on an International Convention to Protect and Promote the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (Bangkok, 2 to 4 June 2003);
  4. "Statement of Recommendations" of the UNESCAP Workshop on Women and Disability: Promoting Full Participation of Women with Disabilities in the Process of Elaboration on an International Convention to Promote and Protect the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (Bangkok, 18-22 August 2003);
  5. "Reconsidering the disability dimension in development cooperation activities; building national capacities for full participation and equality." Basic document for the Regional Workshop towards a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (Bangkok, 14-17 October 2003).
  6. Declaration of Quito - outcome of Regional Seminar and Workshop of the Americas (9-11 April 2003). The Seminar also had contributed and participation papers to facilitate its consideration of the agenda; the list of Seminar documents is presented in Annex IV.

A. Summary of presentations

1. Opening Session

Under item 1 of the provisional agenda, a welcome speech was delivered by Mr. Deng Pufang, the Vice-Chair of the State Council Coordinating Committee on Disability and Chairperson of the China Disabled Persons' Federation (CDPF) (summary of his remarks is presented in the summary of proceedings).

On behalf of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), Ms. Keiko Okaido, Deputy Executive Secretary, UNESCAP delivered the opening message by Dr. Kim Hak-Su, Executive Secretary of ESCAP (A summary of his remarks is presented in the summary of proceedings.)

On behalf of DPI, a message was delivered by Ms. Venus Illgan, the Chairpersons of DPI (A summary of his remarks is presented in the summary of proceedings.).

On behalf of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Ms. Akiko Ito, the focal point on disability, delivered a speech (A summary of his opening speech is presented in the summary of proceedings.).

The Seminar was officially inaugurated by Mr. Shen Guofang, Assistant Minister of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (A summary of his opening speech is presented in the summary of proceedings.).

2. Election of Officers

Under the item 2 of the provisional agenda, Seminar participants elected the following officers by acclimation:

a. Chairperson

Ms. Tang Xiao Quan (PRC)

b. Vice chairpersons:

Mr. Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed (Bangladesh)

Mr. Abdullah Wardak (Afghanistan)

Mr. Soon-Tae Song (ROK)

Ms. Venus Ilagan (DPI)

c. Co-rapportuers:

Ms. Catellina Fermin (Philippines)

Mr. Stephen Pang (Hong Kong-China)

Ms. Anurdah Mohit (National Human Rights Commission of India)

3. Adoption of Seminar agenda

The Chairperson invited the views of participants on the provisional agenda, which they adopted as the programme of work.

4. Keynote statements

Under the agenda item 4 of keynote speeches, Mr. Shen Zhifei, Deputy Secretary General of State Council Coordination Committee on Disability and Vice President of CDPF welcomed participants to the Seminar. He stated that a new legally-binding convention exclusively for persons with disabilities is urgently needed, not only because the disadvantaged situation of persons with disabilities is unacceptable, but also because the change of the current situation really needs such a new convention, basically due to the failure of the existing international instruments system in the provision of protection for rights of persons with disabilities.

Mr. Shen pointed out that the proposed Convention should be elaborated in line with the spirit and fundamental values and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and current international rights instruments, in particular with reference to the World Program of Action concerning Disabled Persons and the Standard Rules on Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities. It should cover all aspects of rights of persons with disabilities, aiming at ensuring the overall improvement of the status and living standard of disabled persons and the realization of their specific rights in areas such as rehabilitation, education, employment, social security and accessibility for their full participation in society.

He emphasized that on one hand the Convention shall clearly state all kinds of rights entitled to disabled persons, but on the other hand and more important, states parties shall take positive measures to ensure an friendly environment for facilitating the realization of those rights.

To conclude his speech, Mr. Shen reiterated China's supportive position and called on more states to join in the efforts of making contribution to the elaboration of the Convention in a speedy manner.

Ms. Anuradha Mohit (National Human Rights Commission in India) spoke a number of crucial aspects in the elaborating process of a proposed convention. First of all, she touched upon emerging issues such as international cooperation for sharing of knowledge, experiences and financial resources. She then mentioned that the convention on the theme of disability is important since it would elaborate its existing rights to suit the circumstances of people with disabilities and it would also establish a third generation of rights such as right to access and reasonable accommodation.

In connection to "protection of the rights," she touched upon inseparable nature of rights and duties /rights and remedies. If rights of persons with disabilities are set out, there will always be an aspect of duties where such entity as States have to guarantee their realization, and remedies have to be provided where the rights are violated.

Lastly she touched upon complex meanings of pragmatism. Some states say that "pragmatism" has to be considered in elaborating the convention, referring to wider acceptability by Governments. Yet, standards of pragmatism are dynamic by nature and differ depending on the stakeholders' interests and needs. Ms. Mohit said that, from a viewpoint of persons with disabilities, realizing the rights, as equal to non-disabled citizens in existing standards becomes the pragmatic standard. She furthered this argument by adding another point that "standard" change over time and the new convention would lay standards for an inclusive society, adding significant value to the doctrine of human rights and development.

5. Objectives of the Seminar

Under the agenda item 5, a representative of the UNESCAP secretariat provided an introduction to the purposes and expected outcome the Seminar. She stated that participants were expected to develop the Declaration of Beijing.

She explained that participates were also expected to review the "Bangkok Draft [proposed elements….]", "The Bangkok Recommendations" and other regional documents and to formulate a policy-oriented statement on the question of the elaboration of a comprehensive and integral convention on the rights of persons with disabilities to be adopted as a Seminar outcome. She added that after the Seminar, the adopted Declaration of Beijing together with he the Bangkok Draft [proposed elements…..] will be submitted to the Ad Hoc Committee, in accordance with General Assembly resolution 57/229, which invited the views of Governments and the United Nations system on the elaboration of a new international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities; copies of these materials will be made available by UNESCAP for the information and comment as appropriate to the Special Rappoteur on Disability of the Commission for Social Development, Sheika Hissa bint khalifa bin Hamad Al-Thani as well as to the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat.

6. Towards the Elaboration of an International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

6.1 Overview of developments towards a proposed convention and implications for building national capacities for equalization of opportunities

Under the agenda item 6.1, Mr. Clinton Rapley, resource person to the seminar, provided a selected review of issues and activities related to the elaboration of a new international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. He recalled the process had begun some 15 years earlier, originating in a recommendation of an expert meeting, hosted by Government of Sweden at Stockholm from 17-22 August 1987, which reviewed progress in implementing the United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons, 1983-1992, at its midpoint. The meeting recommended adoption by the General Assembly of a convention on the rights of persons with disabilities by the end of the Decade. Governmental experts made substantive presentations on options for drafting conventions to the General Assembly in 1987 and 1989, which are reflected in its decision to direct "special attention" to equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities.

The Economic and Social Council of the United Nations decided in 1990 that work should begin on formulation of "standard rules" on equalization of opportunities, which was carried out by means of expert consultations in all regions and in deliberations of the Commission for Social Development. The outcome of this process, the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities" was adopted in 1993 as General Assembly resolution 48/96, annex. The Rules provide policy and normative guidance on promoting full participation and equality of persons with disabilities and include a monitoring mechanism and provision for the appointment of a Special Rapporteur by the Secretary-General. The first Special Rapporteur, Mr. Bengt Lidnqvist (Sweden) presented three comprehensive progress reports and submitted recommendations on further implementation of the Rules. With the adoption of General Assembly resolution 56/168, in 2001, which decided to elaborate a comprehensive and integral convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, Mr. Lindqvist expressed the view that this would best be realized by reinforcing the disability dimension in current human rights treaty bodies and committing to the medium-task of elaborating a new convention.

The decision of the Assembly to initiate a process of elaborating a comprehensive and integral convention to promote and protect the rights of persons with disabilities is based on the statement of President Vincente Fox of Mexico to the General Debate of the fifty-sixth session of the General Assembly in which he noted that if processes of global development were to be sustainable and just, no one should be excluded. The delegation of Mexico was thus proposing the elaborating a new international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in the context of development.

The elaboration of a comprehensive and integral convention is being carried out by an Ad Hoc Committee of the General Assembly, which has received contributions of expert meetings, workshops and seminars at all levels. Outcome documents presenting findings and recommendations of recent regional expert meetings on the convention, which were held at Quito, for the Americas region, Johannesburg, for the Africa region, Beirut, for the Arab region and Bangkok for the Asia and Pacific region were made available to the second session of the Ad Hoc Committee.

He noted the current seminar in Beijing is an integral part of that process, whose outcome in accordance with General Assembly resolution 57/229 and the decision of the second session of the Ad Hoc Committee on its further work, would be made available to the Working Group that is to compile and present a draft text of a convention for consideration of the Ad Hoc Committee at its third session.

Progress in the process of elaborating the new international convention raises several policy considerations, which include: (1) definition in a legal sense of who is to be covered by the convention and its key topics, operational definitions of persons with disabilities, and accessibility in particular; (2) policy context and appropriate institutional framework for the convention, its relationship to current international instruments in the economic and social sectors and means better to reinforce the disability dimension; (3) priorities among basic and supplemental articles in the new convention; (4) capacity building for progress in elaborating and implementing the convention; and (5) options for addressing contentious or complex and difficult issues.

6.2 Overview of UNESCAP moves towards an International Convention and the Bangkok Draft on the proposed elements (outcome of the ESCSP workshop 14-17 June 2003)

Under the agenda item of 6.2, a representative of the UNESCAP secretariat provided a brief overview of UNESCAP moves towards an International Convention that took place during this year. She explained about a sequence of UNESCAP activities including (ii) the first Expert Group Meeting which took place from 2-4 June in Bangkok and its outcome document, the Bangkok Recommendation, (ii) the second Workshop on Women and Disability in which participants discussed gender mainstreaming in the process of elaboration of the Convention (18-22 August 2003, Bangkok) and its outcome document, "Statement of Recommendations" and (iii) the latest event, the Regional Workshop towards a Comprehensive and Integral Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (14-17 October 2003, Bangkok) and its main outcome document, the Bangkok Draft [proposed elements … ]".

Further she explained that the first EGM developed a regional framework for the proposed elements of the Convention, and the second workshop reviewed the Bangkok Recommendations and focused on an very important issue of gender mainstreaming in the elaboration process, and the last expert group workshop developed the fully elaborated framework for the proposed elements of the Convention, developed based on the Bangkok Recommendations, incorporating opinions of regional experts and with assistance of facilitators to the UNESCAP Secretariat.

She focused on some key common denominators extracted from recommendations of all these previous regional meetings, including:

  1. The need for active participation of persons with disabilities, and representatives of disability organizations in all processes of the Convention (preparation, implementation and monitoring);
  2. The need for balancing none-discrimination and specific rights of PWD (comprehensive nature of the Convention);
  3. The critical role of the new Convention to articulate how specific human rights protections required by PWD will apply to the existing UN human rights treaties;
  4. The need for the new Convention to build on the existing UN human rights treaties and universal human rights;
  5. The need for provision of reasonable accommodation/positive measures by the state parties to achieve equality;
  6. Accessibility (both physical access and access to information) as a critical element of the Convention.
  7. Mainstreaming of disabled women's issues in an elaboration process, including participation of disabled women in the process.

6.3 Overview of the second session of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral Convention on Protecting and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (16-22 June 2003, New York)

Under agenda item of 2.3, Mr. Shen Zhifei, Deputy Secretary General of the State Council Coordination Committee on Disability, China, shared information on the 2nd UN Ad Hoc Committee meeting in New York, held in June 2003. By recalling the appeal for a new international convention expressed by leaders of international disability organizations in Beijing in March 2003, Mr. Shen said that the current Convention process in UN was the outcome of joint efforts of various stakeholders especially disability movement worldwide.

He regarded the Second Ad Hoc Committee meeting as a progress, compared to the First Session for a number reasons: 1) wide consensus has been reached in favor of elaborating a Convention during this meeting; 2) in-depth discussions signifies a good indication that the process might be accelerated; 3) decision to set up a drafting working group composed of governmental representatives from member states and NGOs. Convention process entered a critical stage, bringing good news for persons with disabilities and the international community as a whole.

Mr. Shen reminded participants that the unique opportunity before us should be treasured. He said, at the Second Ad Hoc Committee Session, while deliberating elements to be considered by the future Convention, many states were of the opinion that the Convention should cover all aspects of rights such as political, civil as well as economic, social and cultural fields and governments should be obliged to take positive measures to eradicate barriers and create favorable environment for full participation of persons with disability. Given the fact that 80 percent of disabled persons are living in developing countries, the Convention shall have full account of the status quo and concern of developing countries.

To successfully promote the Convention, a realistic and workable strategy must be adopted - he emphasized.

7. Rights based approach to development and empowerment of persons with disabilities

7.1 Capacity building of national governments and NGOs to promote the rights of persons with disabilities

Under the agenda item 7.1, Mr. Nicholas Howen (Regional Advisor for Asia and the Pacific, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights) provided an overview of basic principles of the proposed (and any) international human rights treaty and rights-based approach to development.

He emphasized that in human rights-based approach, development is defined as "realization of all rights", and development is about human begins and not sheer abstract concept of economic growth. He emphasized that an individual has a right to participate in the process of development. In rights-based approach, international community has obligation to create an international order that helps development with fairness and justice.

He listed six key principles about the proposed Convention for PWD, including (1) the concept of non-discrimination, (2) need for changing socio-cultural prejudices and stereotypes against PWD, (3) as starting point, the listing of existing human rights accepted by international human rights treaties (not to create a new set of human rights for PWD but to ensure how these rights should apply to PWD, (4) inter-dependency and indivisibility of all rights; (5) the link among enforceability, remedies, and accountability (e.g. PWD should be able to claim their rights and seek appropriate remedies).

He continued his presentation by stressing that a human rights approach to development emphasizes that those being discriminated against must be consulted in the process that affect their lives and the convention could address this well. Participation means consulting with people early about their aspirations, allowing them to argue what is in their best interest in the competition for scarce resources, playing some roles in implementing programmes as well as monitoring and evaluating them.

He concluded his presentation by re-affirming that human rights guarantee only minimum and not maximum, and concerning socio-economic rights, human rights allow states to put them in place gradually, within the prevailing conditions in the country and available resources.

7.2 Presentation of the Biwako Millennium Framework for Action towards an Inclusive, Barrier- free and Rights- based Society for Persons with Disabilities in Asia and the Pacific (MBF) as a tool for mainstreaming disability concerns

Under agenda item 7.2, UN NESCAP representatives briefly introduced the key elements of the UNESCAP policy guideline document, the BMF and its relevance to the process towards the Convention.

They listed seven priority targets for action, stipulated in the BMF, including; (1) self-help organizations of persons with disabilities; (2) women and disabilities; (3) early detection, early intervention and education, (4) training and employment; (5) access to built environments and public transport; (6) access to information and ICTs; (7) poverty alleviation through capacity building, social security and sustainable livelihood programmes. Furthermore they added four strategies for achievement of the targets, including (1) national plan of action on disability; (2) promotion of a rights-based approach and support the process towards the Convention; (3) disability statistics and common definitions of disabilities for planning and (4) strengthening CBR.

They explained the urgent need for considering incorporating disability perspective and concerns in the Millennium Development Goals and other multilateral development projects of UNESCAP, taking into consideration the fact that BMF was formulated based on the same format as MDGs for its specific purpose of integration of disability concerns. They also emphasized the pressing need for incorporating disability perspective in the monitoring of implementation of the MDGs in connection with a major review of progress in MDG implementation scheduled for 2005. In this regard they emphasized the urgent need for and UNESCAP's commitment to improved coordination between the UNESCAP disability team and the MDG focal point to ensure this matter.

They concluded their presentation emphasizing that UNESCAP approach and the BMF document adopted a double track approach with a paradigm shift for advancement of persons with disabilities focusing on human rights approach, and at the same time UNESCAP's continuing effort to push forward developmental approaches to advancement of persons with disabilities and the promotion of their human rights. They explained an example of several disability mainstreaming projects (into development projects) of UNESCAP, such as disability classification and statistics projects, and the planned focus on poverty and disability in 2004-2005 UN ESCAP work programme.

8. International Cooperation

8.1 Future options for disability policy and programme within the context of a broad human rights framework

Under agenda item 8.1, Ms. Akiko Ito, the focal point on disability issue, UN DESA, provided an overview of future options for disability policy and programme within the context of a broad human rights framework.

Ms. Ito covered various issues about the process toward the Convention including (1) the historical background; (2) the 4th Review and Appraisal of World Programme of Action and the continuing work of promoting the broad human rights framework; (3) the Ad Hoc Committee process and the "organic" linkage within the existing normative framework and (4) possible options for promoting the rights of people with disabilities in the future.

She stressed the importance of utilizing the existing frameworks for making disability issue a part of the human rights agenda and policy, and incorporating disability into the overall development agenda, policy and networks. She explained a few steps towards promoting the rights of persons with disabilities; including (i) full exploration of the existing human rights, standards and other mechanisms; (ii) improving access to the institutional resources for utilizing legal and administrative procedures; (iii) capacity building in the disability community as well as non-traditional sector of society and (iv) networking to forge a sense of integrated community to prioritize the agenda for promotion and protection of the rights of PWD.

She mentioned a few methods of promoting the policy discourse, including (i) adoption of legislative framework (by the States), reflecting international standards; (ii) commitment of policy makers, progarmme planners and technical experts to broaden policy dialogues on disability; (iii) involvement of civil society in a broad discourse on law and disability policies and (iv) organization of innovative forums for legal and policy experts, academics and civil society.

She concluded her remarks by emphasizing the need for converging new and continuing efforts to develop a new comprehensive framework for disability integration.

8.2 Ongoing work on disability to support the process toward the Convention

Under agenda item 8.2, Ms. Mona Pare, a junior officer, UN DESA, briefly covered the ongoing work of DESA on disability, to support the process towards the Convention. Ms. Pare explained about the critical role of the UN global programme on disability in the convention elaboration process within the framework of the overall mandate of the Division for Social Policy and Development (DESA). She fully described the conceptual framework of DESA work, listing some particular activities.

The main issued covered in her presentation included the growing awareness of the need to link development and human rights in practice, as well as to mainstream disability within development and human rights. She looked at the critical role of the UN global programme on disability in facilitating the establishment of links between development and human rights.

They added the key elements of their work including (i) the provision of support in emerging and key areas through research, analytical papers, call on to experts, and organization of meetings; (ii) the facilitation of dialogue by making information accessible, organizing meetings, on-line virtual discussion forums; (iii) facilitation of the use of broader human rights framework and provision of information on disability norms and standards and their implementation at different levels, and conducting training workshops and seminars for capacity building.

The main projects described in her presentation included their on-going project on the Resource on International Norms and Standards relating to Disability, and the Compendium of International and Regional Instruments relating to Disability, which were published, and made available under their website, as well as UN DESA's virtual (on-line) discussion forums.

She added a new project that is currently being developed, namely the Disability Norms and Standards Project, which has various components such as the creation of a database on international, regional and national norms and standards relating to disability, and training programmes in capacity building in the relevant area.

9. National policies and national capacities

9.1 Implications for building national capacities for equalization of opportunities

Under agenda item 9.1, Mr. Clinton Rapley, seminar resource person, reviewed the role of development cooperation activities in building national capacities for equalization of opportunities. He recalled that work related to the elaboration of a comprehensive and integral convention being carried out by the Ad Hoc Committee had focused mainly on issues of purposes, structure and content of the new convention. Little attention had been directed to date on the question of building national capacities and strengthening institutional capabilities.

The policy basis for development cooperation for equalization of opportunities is presented in Rule 21 of the Standard Rules, which considers the role of technical and economic cooperation in promoting equalization of opportunities. However, 10 years after the adoption of the Rules by the General Assembly, development cooperation options to build national capacities for equalization of opportunities in mainstream development remain limited - a finding presented by Mr.Bengt Lindqvist in his first monitoring report, for the period 1994-1997, as Special Rapporteur on Disability.

In part this results from the absence of persons with disabilities in any of the eight development goals of the Millennium Declaration, which is a principal source of policy guidance for international cooperation in the twenty-first century. No efforts have been made to incorporate the disability dimension in mainstream coordination tools of the United Nations system for development cooperation - the Common County Assessment and the United Nations Development Assistance Framework. Moreover, persons with disabilities are included as members of a "vulnerable group" in the guidelines for the "Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper" of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

Progress in reinforcing the disability dimension in mainstream development cooperation activities in order to empower persons with disabilities to participate on the basis of equality in all aspects of life ultimately is related to the process of elaborating a comprehensive and integral convention to promote and protect their rights of persons with disabilities in the context of mainstream development.

Empowerment of persons with disabilities in the twenty-first century will also involve new partners in development, including the private sector, and technologies that provide environmental accessibility with reasonable accommodation.

9.2. Review of national situation of the rights of persons with disabilities

Under agenda item 9.2, Ms Penny Price (Resource Person) and Mr Clinton Rapley (Resource Person) and an ESCAP representative facilitated the presentation of national experiences. Nineteen papers and short presentations were made during this session from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Fiji, India, Japan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Nepal, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Samoa, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam, Hong Kong (China), Inclusion International, Asian and Pacific Region, and the Japanese Federation of Organizations of Disabled Persons.

The presentations reflected the strong commitment of Governments of the region to addressing the issue of disabilities. They also reflected the regional diversity in terms of development and achievements towards the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities.

Common elements discussed included the importance of developing a legal framework, and adoption of non-discrimination legislation or mechanisms. National policy had been developed by many Governments, some on the basis of 5 years plans, and this was seen as an area of high priority by those Governments who had not yet developed national policy and plans. Annual reporting of progress in implementing measures for persons with disabilities, reported by the Government of Japan, was viewed as exemplary practice.

Common concerns expressed included strong awareness of the link between disability and poverty, and the need to address poverty within the framework of national development. Poor implementation of current laws and regulations, and the lack of data and statistics on persons with disabilities were seen as related problems. Continuing limited access to basic social services such as health, education and employment prevented the achievement of equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. Particular problems forced by countries in post-conflict situations were addressed, noting that difficulties faced by particularly vulnerable groups everywhere, such as women and children with disabilities, were magnified in this context. The need to identify positive measures, and priority areas for action was emphasized. It was strongly affirmed that all measures concerning persons with disabilities should be undertaken in consultation with persons with disabilities and their organizations. Social development was fundamental for the achievement of inclusive and participatory societies.

Governments acknowledged the important role played by current international instruments in guiding the development of national policy and action plan implementation. Particular reference was made to the invaluable guidelines provided by the Agenda for Action of the first Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons (1993-2002), and more recently, by the Biwako Millennium Framework for Action for the second Decade (2003-2012). Further reference was made to the World Programme of Action, and the Standard Rules for the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities.

Governments expressed unanimous support for the proposed Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and expressed the view that the convention would provide clear guidance for the development of national policy and action. It was viewed as important that the Convention contain the specific delineation of the rights of persons with disabilities and that States parties accept responsibility under the terms of the Convention. There was also a need to take differences in national capacity into account.

10. Orientation for working group discussions

Under this agenda item 10, a UN ESCAP representative provided an overview of issues to be considered in the group work, including priority issues to be selected from the participants, from a wide range of recommendations presented by regional experts and priority issues related to basic principles such as full participation of persons with disabilities and accessibility. It was made clear that the purpose of the Seminar was not to discuss on technical details of the articles and provisions, but to discuss on priorities among articles in the convention text, general principles, definitions in a legal sense (who will be covered by this Convention), options for addressing contentious and complex issues such as monitoring, policy context and utilization of existing institutional framework, and new emerging issues for implementation such as technical cooperation, capacity building and none-state parties' obligations, which will form the basis for preparation of the Declaration of Beijing (to be prepared by the Drafting Committee).

11. Working Group Discussions

Under the agenda item 11, the participants were divided into the following three working groups;

  • Preamble, Definitions (Disability, Discrimination), General Obligations of State Parties - broad definition of accessibility (Part I of the Bangkok Draft)
  • Civil and Political Rights (Part II of the Bangkok Draft) and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Part III of the Bangkok Draft)
  • Other State Obligations/Application of the Convention (Part IV to the end of the Bangkok Draft)

Each group elected a facilitator and a rapporteur and led a discussion covering issues assigned. At the end of the day, four groups came back to the plenary room and shared a progress report from each group (see the group reports in Annex III).

The drafting committee discussed reports from each of the four working groups, and reviewed presentations and key discussions during the plenary sessions, and formulated a set of recommendations and declarations on the priorities of the elaboration of a new comprehensive and integral Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, under a policy-oriented statement entitled the "Declaration of Beijing".

While the committee was undertaking this task, a filed visit was arranged by CDPF for the rest of participants.

12. Discussion of the Draft Declaration of Beijing

Under agenda item 12, at the plenary session, the participants examined and had an in-depth and detailed discussion over the content and language the draft Declaration of Beijing (prepared by the Drafting Committee).

13. Adoption of the Declaration of Beijing by participants

At the end of the discussion, the draft Declaration of Beijing was unanimously adopted after some amendments and revisions (please see the section I of this report for the adopted version of the Declaration of Beijing).

14. Closing Session

Also, CDPF representative, Ms Tang Xiaoquan, President of China Disabled Persons' Federation made a closing remark by thanking contribution made by resource persons, facilitators, rappoteurs and all the participants.

Summary of key discussions during the Seminar

  • The issue of definitions in a legal sense was raised. Particularly the defining disability was raised for purpose of identifying categories of people to be protected and covered by the Convention. This issue was discussed in June at the Second Session of the Ad-Hoc Committee and more complex conceptual challenges were revealed. In the ESCAP EGM on the Convention (2-4 June 2003) and the ESCAP Workshop (14-17 October 2003), the outcomes have not made much improvement in tackling the definitions and challenges. In the Seminar, participants were encouraged to seek possible options in dealing with this complex issue.
  • UNESCAP was invited to raise the capacity in the region to work on the issues of definitions by organizing workshops and seminars inviting UN system experts and other related experts of mainstream professional bodies. Such capacity building activities should be held before the next session of the Ad Hoc Committee.
  • There was an exchange of opinions on the Bangkok Draft. While one delegate pointed out that Bangkok Draft was not an inter-governmental consensus statement (NOT adopted) and certain points in the Draft were still not agreed upon (contentious issues), several participants received it as a very important technical document. The participants were asked to utilize the Bangkok Draft as one of the main background documents and key reference materials, together with the Bangkok Recommendations, for discussions and preparation for the consensus statement for possible adoption.
  • The Seminar recognized the important contribution of two UN normative documents, the Standard Rules of the lization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities and the World Programme of Action. These two documents have built a solid base to support the elaboration of the proposed Convention that is essential to meet demands of the millennium in protecting and promoting the rights of persons with disabilities.
  • The issue of monitoring mechanism was raised and options were mentioned including the utilization of existing mechanism, converging the existing monitoring mechanism of various human rights treaties (considering the burden of state parties with a new convention) and re-vitalizing the existing function of the Special Rapporteur on Disability Issues (of the Commission for Social Development).
  • It was recommended that governments would include disability issues into technical cooperation framework, particularly in terms of technical support and transfer of resources, as appropriate, to help developing countries to overcome difficulties for the purpose of implementation of the Convention and realization of equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities.
  • On international cooperation to support capacity building at national level, it was suggested that UN and UNESCAP could make use of existing national coordinating committees and networks of NGOs/INGOs.
  • To support the elaboration process of the Convention, national coordinating committees should be supported through ongoing regional/international workshops, and in particular UNESCAP was invited to provide technical services on capacity building and sensitizing at sub-regional level.
  • The question was raised concerning the modality of application for and utilization of the United Nations Voluntary Fund, which is a very small-scale fund for seed money for NGOs in development countries. A few NGOs inquired the "know how" about application for funding from the voluntary fund for capacity building. The information about application for funding from the UN Voluntary fund is available on the DESA home page.
  • UNESCAP explained the mechanism of existing Trust Fund (a very small technical cooperation fund) on disability, and a few examples of UNESCAP technical cooperation projects with regional NGOs, such as the forthcoming workshop with APDF in Nov. 2003, and a workshop with a NGO on Downs Syndrome to be held in Singapore sometimes during the first quarter of 2004.
  • 7 seats for the Working Group were announced (China, India, Japan, Lebanon, ROK, Philippines, and Thailand), and 5 Seats from the Western European Block was announced (Canada, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, and Sweden).
  • The issue concerning the process of the work to be done by the Working Group was raised and clarified. The first working group session will take place in January 2003, for 2 weeks. At current stage, a number of contributions submitted by governments, inter-governmental bodies, NGOs, and other concerned parties are being complied in the form of draft text. Governments, NGOs, UN regional commissions, intergovernmental bodies, and other relevant parties are invited to make their suggestions on the elements of the Convention available to the Working Group/Ad Hoc Committee, in a various forms, such as draft text forms, broad conceptual documents, guiding principles, technical substances, etc. The Working Group is mandated to compile all of those contributions for submission to the forthcoming 3rd Session of the Ad Hod Committee. On-line web page on progress of the work done by the Working Group is available under UN DESA disability sub-programme home page.
  • Afghanistan will give the fullest support to the Bangkok Draft and upon minor modifications to meet socio-economic needs in the country; it will submit a national version of the Convention Text, based on the Bangkok Draft. The Philippines announced the country's endorsement of the Bangkok Recommendations and the Bangkok Draft. The Philippines will not draft the text of its own, rather it will give the fullest support to the Bangkok Draft at the Working Group and the 3rd session of Ad Hoc Committee. Furthermore, the Bangkok Draft was fully supported by the coalition of NGOs in Japan.
  • China has developed its own version of the Convention text, and India is in the process of developing its own national version. The Republic of Korea is planning to develop and submit its own national version, too.
  • The issue about monitoring mechanisms, and individual complaints (communication) procedures were singled out as "contentious" issues, and some governments are showing reservations concerning inclusion of individual communication procedures. In this regard, an option of reservation was raised and clarified. Regardless of diversified views and opinions about monitoring mechanism, there is a consensus about the need for creating international and national monitoring mechanisms with the proposed Convention. The majority view was that it is not necessary for the international review mechanism to have provisions to receive individual complaints and to initiate inquiry.
  • The Group affirmed that all human rights instruments should be recognized in the Convention. The participants agreed that the Convention should make use of existing rights instruments but they must be applicable to ensure full enjoyment of PWDs of the rights.
  • The comprehensiveness of the Convention was reaffirmed and all rights including socio-economic and political rights are important. However, in terms of priorities, the general feeling was expressed that while we need a comprehensive Convention covering all aspects of rights for PWDs, the focus should be on disability-specific rights, including the accessibility rights.
  • Positive and proactive measures are very important in ensuring the realization of rights of PWDs.
  • Reasonable adaptation (they preferred the term "reasonable adaptation" to "reasonable accommodation) is a very important element yet there is further need to agree upon definitions that are acceptable to stakeholders.
  • It was agreed that rights to independent living and living in own community of PWDs is critical however the definition of independent living should be further elaborated.
  • Concerning service delivery, an issue related to dynamism, modality and options was raised, as PWDs should choose what is in their best of interest, in accordance with individual needs and circumstances.
  • The participants agreed upon that there is a need for establishing an appropriate independent monitoring mechanism at international and national levels, with balanced participation of PWDs and organizations of PWDs.

 


III. ORGANIZATION OF THE WORKSHOP

1. Background

Globally, developments towards an international disability-specific convention have been accelerated during the last couple of years.

The United Nations General Assembly, by its resolution 56/168 of 19 December 2001, established an Ad Hoc Committee to consider proposals for a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention to promote and protect the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The first session of the Ad Hoc Committee was held in New York in 2002, and the subsequent General Assembly resolution, 57/229 of 18 December 2002 further encouraged Governments, United Nations bodies, including regional commissions, to make available to the Ad Hoc Committee suggestions and possible elements to be considered in proposals for a convention.

In the UNESCAP region, Governments declared the extension of the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 1993-2002, for another decade, 2003-2012 through Commission resolution 58/4 of 22 May 2002. The Decade was renewed to improve on sub regional differences in progress and give further impetus for full participation and equal opportunities of persons with disabilities.

As the policy and action guideline for the renewed decade, the High-level Intergovernmental Meeting to Conclude the Asian and Pacific Decade, Otsu, Shiga, October 2002 adopted the Biwako Millennium Framework for Action towards an Inclusive, Barrier-Free and Rights-Based Society for Persons with Disabilities in Asia and the Pacific (BMF).

The BMF promotes the paradigm shift from a charity-based approach to a rights-based approach to disability and development, and incorporates disability concerns into national policies and programmes for the purpose of achieving the targets of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDG). The BMF sets out seven priority areas [2], and it urges Governments to ratify core international human rights treaties, to support the elaboration of a proposed convention, and to include persons with disabilities at every-level of the elaborating process.

Following these resolutions and the BMF, UNESCAP organized the Expert Group Meeting and Seminar on an International Convention to Protect and Promote the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities held from 2 to 4 June 2003. The Meeting produced a comprehensive set of General Recommendations on the proposed convention, entitled 'the Bangkok Recommendations.'

The Bangkok Recommendations were submitted to the Second Session of the Ad Hoc Committee, held from 16 to 27 June 2003 in New York, where Member States unanimously agreed to start elaborating a proposed convention. At this Committee, Working Group was established to develop a consolidated draft convention text for the Third Session of the Ad Hoc Committee to be held next year. This Working Group is composed of twenty-seven governmental representatives (Asia 7, Africa 7, America 5, Western Europe 5, and Eastern Europe 3), twelve representatives of disability NGO and one representative from National Human Rights Institute. The Working Group is scheduled to be held from 5 to 16 January 2003 in New York.

Prior to the Workshop, two phases of Workshop on Women and Disability: Promoting Full Participation of Women with Disabilities in the Process of Elaboration on an International Convention to Promote and Protect the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities were held 18 to 22 August 2003 and 13 October 2003. This Workshop produced a Statement of Recommendations, which express unified support for a proposed convention with specific recommendations from disabled women's perspectives.

The Regional Workshop towards a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities was held to contribute to the global elaboration process on a proposed convention, by sufficiently incorporating concerns of women and men with disabilities in Asia and the Pacific region. The region has the largest number of persons with disabilities (approximately 400 million) in the world. As the outcome of the Workshop, it intended to adopt a draft of a proposed convention, entitled "Bangkok Draft.'

UNESCAP invited individual experts of disability policies and human rights, and participants representing the previous Workshop on Women and Disability. All these experts were expected to contribute their substantive and technical knowledge to the Workshop as well as empowering themselves with direct involvement in a convention elaborating process. Experts were from governmental agencies, semi-governmental agencies and civil society organizations (organizations for persons with disabilities and self-help organizations of persons with disabilities). Persons with disabilities include those who have physical, visual, hearing and psychiatric disabilities.

The Workshop had three major components. The first one (the first day) was to review the global and regional elaborating processes. The second one (the second day and the third day) was the working group discussions where participants were divided into four working groups and worked on the Bangkok Discussion draft. This Discussion draft was prepared, prior to the Workshop, in light of the Bangkok Recommendations and statement of recommendations from the Workshop on Women and Disability. The third component (the last day) was to incorporate and synthesize the discussions into a set of General Recommendations on elements and principles for the Bangkok Draft as well as developing the Bangkok Draft.

Immediately after the Workshop, the Bangkok Draft was revised by the UNESCAP facilitator, based on the last discussion at the Workshop and the "Bangkok Draft (version 2)" then was made available to this Seminar for discussions and for formulation of a political statement entitled the Declaration of Beijing, in the end. Both this "Bangkok Draft [the proposed elements ….]" and the Declaration of Beijing (outcome of this Seminar) will be submitted to the Ad Hoc Committee with a copy to a special rappoteur on Commission on Social Development, and the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA).

2. Attendance

The Seminar was attended by 27 government experts from 17 countries of the ESCAP region, resource persons and a number of observers from 2 UN agencies and 19 NGOs and other entities. (See Annex I).

3. Opening of the workshop

A welcome speech was delivered by Mr. Deng Pufang, the Vice-Chair of the State Council Coordinating Committee on Disability and Chairperson of the China Disabled Persons' Federation (CDPF).

Mr. Deng first extended welcome to all participants on behalf of the Chinese Government and 60 millions of disabled persons in China and its organization, CDPF. He said that with experience and lessons learnt from the international disability movement in the past two decades, we were convinced that the cause for disabled persons is not only a matter related to human rights but also social development; therefore the future convention should have full account of these two different yet inter-related aspects or elements. He expressed his hope to see a Convention becoming a helpful instrument to facilitate and promote social development and cause for disabled persons in each country, rather than something that might evoke new disputes and contradictions among parties in the disability area.

To conclude, Mr. Deng urged an early outcome of the Convention, adding it was really a pressing issue to be addressed by the international community for the sake of disabled persons as one of the most disadvantaged groups in the world and in this regard, Asian and Pacific region should have a more active and proactive role to play at the world arena and make its contribution for the Convention process.

On behalf of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), Ms. Keiko Okaido, Deputy Executive Secretary, UNESCAP read the opening message by Dr. Kim Hak-Su, Executive Secretary of ESCAP

In his opening statement; Dr. Kim first expressed his gratitude to the Government of China and CDPF which have greatly supported the efforts of UNESCAP, both for the past and present Asian and Pacific Decades of Disabled Persons. He then extended his appreciation to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA).

Dr. Kim Hak-Su explained the international and regional background of the Seminar and stressed its significance, citing the Seminar's expected outcome, the Declaration of Beijing will be submitted together with the Bangkok Draft to the Working Group, commissioned under the Ad Hoc Committee for a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention to Promote and Protect the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in New York.

He showed his appreciation to the fact that experts from 6 out of 7 Asian Block membership of the Working Group under the Ad Hoc Committee had come to the Seminar, and further appreciated the hard-work done by delegates from the China Disabled People's Federation (CDPF who was the co-organizer of this Seminar).

He concluded his opening remarks by reaffirming the paradigm shift from a charity-based approach to a rights-based and development approach towards empowerment of persons with disabilities, the principle of the current Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons.

On behalf of Disabled People's International (DPI), a message was delivered by Ms. Venus Illgan, the Chairpersons of DPI. First she conveyed to the participants warm greetings from the World Council of Disabled Peoples' International - a global federation of national cross-disability organizations of disabled persons with consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations.

Ms. Illagan said that DPI was very pleased and appreciative of the various initiatives of the Asia-Pacific region in support of the ongoing efforts for an international convention to promote and protect the rights of disabled persons. She valued the strong partnership among the UN ESCAP, various governments and non-governmental organizations (including those of disabled persons), which had made the ESCAP region one of the more active contributors of knowledge and inputs to the ongoing work for a disability rights convention. In theory, disabled peopled are covered by the existing international human rights framework in the same manner and to the same extent as all people. In reality, however, the framework is deficient for persons with disabilities in several respects. The existing treaties do not adequately address the unique physical, social, economic and legal circumstances of people with disabilities, and in particular, the common barriers to the enjoyment of their basic human rights such as the right to education, employment, health care, and housing. Also, the current framework is not effective in identifying practices that lead to severe rights abuses against disabled people. Finally, many of the institutions tasked to ensure enjoyment of the basic rights and entitlements of people with disabilities are under-resourced and often lack a critical disability rights perspective. She stressed that the new Convention should be a human rights instrument based on the principles of equal opportunity, equal rights, equal treatment and non-discrimination. She stressed that the new Convention should be comprehensive in scope and it should be one addressing the economic, social, cultural, civil and political rights of persons with disabilities. She continued saying that persons with disabilities have the claim to all and the same human rights that have been articulated in human rights laws. She stressed that the purpose of the new Convention should not to invent new rights for disabled persons but to ensure the guarantee of the rights already recognized for all people by the various UN human rights treaties.

She concluded her speech by thanking the UN ESCAP, CDPF and the Government of China as well as various governments and non-governmental organizations in the region for their strong commitment and support to the work for a thematic Convention.

On behalf of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Ms. Akiko Ito, the focal point on disability, delivered a speech. First of all, Ms. Ito thanked the organizers of the Seminar, for taking important action to face the significant challenge in making the universal rights a reality of persons with disabilities. She stated that the work of the United Nations accorded importance to the rights of persons with disabilities in the broad normative framework (reflected in various declarations, programme of actions of the United Nations global conferences and summits in 1990s, and their respective five-year review, particularly on such issues as poverty eradication, advancement of women and adequate and accessible shelter). She recalled that the second session of the Ad Hoc Committee, which took place in June 2003, had decided to elaborate a convention and had formulated the Working group to prepare for the basis of the Convention text before meeting at its first session, sometime early 2004. She appreciated the CDPF's great contributions to the ongoing process for an elaboration of an international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, including its initiative of the "Consultative Meeting on International Norms and Standards Related to Disability" which was co-organized with DESA, held in 2002. She concluded her statement by highlighting the support by DESA to a series of UN ESCAP meetings and seminars on the Convention, which contributed to strengthening the ESCAP region's capacity in the process.

The Seminar was officially inaugurated by Mr. Shen Guofang, Assistant Minister of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China. He said all members of the international community were obliged to protect the rights of persons with disabilities and to improve their status. For this, a number of things should be done, including: (1) efforts to maintain world peace, stability and a concerted economic and social development in each country, so to create a sound environment for survival and development of all human beings; (2) States need to take legislative, administrative and other measures to ensure the rights of persons with disabilities to gain access to education, employment and more resources and accessible services which are vital for their full participation in society; (3) to enhance international cooperation in forms of mobility of funds and promoting technical assistance particularly from the developed countries to less developed and developing countries where 80 percent of world disabled persons live.

He reaffirmed that Chinese Government's commitment to protect rights of persons with disabilities and promote international cooperation in this regard and hoped to work together with all other counterparts in this region for the International Convention and for a better future of disabled persons in the region.

4. Adoption of the subjects of the Seminar

The Seminar adopted the following subjects:

  1. Opening Session
  2. Election of the Officers
  3. Adoption of the agenda
  4. Keynote speeches
  5. Objectives of the Seminar
  6. Towards the Elaboration of an International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
    • 6.1. Overview of the process of the Standard Rules and the proposed International convention on the rights of persons with disabilities
    • 6.2. Overview of ESCAP move towards an international convention and "the Bangkok Draft [the elements of the Convention….. ]"
    • 6.3.. Overview of the second session of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral Convention on Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (16-27 June 2003, New York)
  7. Rights based approaches to development and empowerment of persons with disabilities
    • 7.1. Capacity building of national governments and NGOs to promote the rights of persons with disabilities
    • 7.2. Presentation of the Biwako Millennium Framework for Action as a tool for mainstreaming disability concerns
  8. International cooperation
    • 8.1. Future options for disability policy
    • 8.2. Ongoing work on disability to support the process toward the Convention
  9. National policies and national capacities
    • 9.1. Implications for building national capacities for equalization of opportunities
    • 9.2. Review of national situation of the rights of persons with disabilities
  10. Orientation of the Working Group Discussions
  11. Working Group Discussions
    1. Preamble, General, General obligation of State Parties
    2. Civil and Political Rights and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
    3. Application of the Convention
  12. Discussion on the draft Declaration of Beijing
  13. Adoption of the Declaration of Beijing on Elaboration of an International Convention on Promoting and Protecting the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities
  14. Closing of the Seminar

5. Adoption of on the Declaration of Beijing

The participants in the Seminar discussed, agreed upon and adopted a set of the Recommendations contained in the Declaration of Beijing (see Section I of this report).

 


Annexes

Annex I: List of participants

Annex II: Programme of the workshop

Annex III: Report of three working groups

Working Group 1

Working Group 2

Working Group 3

Annex IV. List of references

 


Notes:

[2] The seven priority areas are as follows: (1) self-help organizations of persons with disabilities and related family and parental associations, (2) women with disabilities, (3) early detection, early intervention and education, (4) training and employment, including self-employment, (5) access to built environments and public transport, (6) access to information and communications, including information and communications and assistive technologies, and (7) poverty alleviation through capacity-building, social security and sustainable livelihood programmes.


Copyright (c) 2003 Vision Office.
Last updated 11/10/03. Contact: info @ visionoffice.com