Skip Navigation
Agents of Change

Agents of Change: Workshop on Self-help Organizations of Persons with Disabilities (SHOs), Related Family and Parents Associations and Women with Disabilities towards Biwako Plus five
18-20 October 2006, Bangkok, Thailand

 Main| Programme| Materials| Online| Bangkok| WorldEnable home
Programme : Presentation:

Text version of a PowerPoint Presentation:

Social capital and social enterprise: A complementary strategy for sustainable development of self help organizations of people with disabilities

Presented by Joseph Kwok


Slide 1

Social capital and social enterprise :

A complementary strategy for sustainable development of self help organizations of people with disabilities

Joseph Kwok


2

Introduction

SHOPs and targets of BMF:

Governments, INGOs and NGOs should, by 2004, establish policies with the requisite resource allocations to support the development and formation of SHOPs in all areas, and with a specific focus on slum and rural dwellers. Governments should take steps to ensure the formation of parents associations at local levels by the year 2005 and federate them at the national level by year 2010.


3

BMG action agenda for SHOPs:

…..should develop programmes for capacity-building to empower their members, including youth and women with disabilities, to take consultative and leadership roles in the community at large as well as in their own organizations and enable them to serve as trainers in the development of leadership and management skills of members of self-help organizations.


4

Introduction

  • Achievement of the key policy targets: ?
  • Government support for SHOP: ?
  • APCD
  • A complementary strategy of SHOPs through social capital investment and social enterprise, to achieving self-sufficiency in sustainable organizational development.

5-7

PERSPECTIVES On SHOPs

  • SHOPs: processes of creation, empathetic emotional and mutual peer support, experiential information, sharing network, new culture, new ideology and new identity. A response to dissatisfaction of traditional professional services.
  • A United Nations’ Perspective on SHOPs
  • UN International Year of the Disabled Persons 1981 and SHOPs
  • 1993, United Nations’ 22 Standard Rules for actualizing the theme in action. Rule 18 states that it is the responsibility of the state to support the formation and development of the organizations of persons with disabilities.
  • Towards a Multi-Dimensional Understanding of the Study of SHOPs:
    SHOPs common characteristics: (1) led or governed by members with disabilities, including their family carers and relatives; (2) members share a common problem or experience, or a common challenge; and (3) aim to promote mutual benefit in a form of free reciprocal help, experiential understanding, self-determination, and self-empowerment.

8

SHOPs’ varying characteristics:

  1. degree of involvement of non-disabled members;
  2. bureaucratic and hierarchical structure;
  3. membership size and coverage;
  4. benefits to members and non-members, services provisions and types, complexity of programme and philosophy;
  5. role of advocacy; and
  6. alliances with other advocacy groups in civic issues and social change orientations.

9-12

CRITICAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHOPs

  1. Organization and leadership
  2. Relationship with partnership organizations
  3. Relationship with the society at large: The following questions are considered to have theoretical interests for further deliberations:
    • Will a collaborative route be more effective for NGOs in a highly participatory democratic culture?
    • Will a complementary strategy be more effective in a civil society characterized by a diversity of power centers?
    • Will a confrontational approach by NGOs be more influential in a multiparty electoral system composed of many power centers?
    • Will a consciousness-raising strategy work best within a state that protects political and civil rights?
    • Will investment in social capital a more critical factor affecting sustainability of SHOPs.
  4. Disability as a human right issue in a globalization process and SHOPs as disability rights advocate: lessons learned from the Convention drafting process

13-15

SHOPS AS ACTORS IN CIVIL AND INCLUSION SOCIETY

  • how to mobilize a genuinely inclusive civil society at every level;
  • how to hold other institutions accountable for their actions and ensure that they respond to social and environmental needs;
  • how to ensure that international regimes are both implemented effectively and work to the benefit of poor people and poor countries; and
  • how to ensure that gains made at the global level are translated into concrete benefits at the grass-roots.
  • The social networks generated by SHOPs: an important form of ‘social capital’
  • SHOPs need to take note their roles in the making of civil society when making their demands.
  • Good indications that SHOPs in various Asian countries place emphasis on their network with civic groups, NGOs and GOs, business and the private sectors.
  •  SHOPs should not confine itself to the role of an interest group, but more as a key stakeholder in civil society on general issues.

16-17

SHOPS IN RELATION TO OTHER ACTOR IN CIVIL SOCIETY

  • many similar organizations with different interests backgrounds.
  • few governments provide for recurrent support
  • to compete with other grass-roots organizations or national level interests groups for limited government budget.
  • At the grass-roots level, there is a tendency for more self-help groups to emerge
  • The range of disabilities types also has been extending, particularly those close to mental health situation and chronic illnesses.
  • SHOPs to learn from the Convention drafting process.

18-23

SOCIAL CAPITAL AND SHOP

  • The World Bank: social capital a major factor affecting the sustainability of poverty eradication programmes.
  • OECD: interests from human capital to include social capital and its impact on sustainable social development.
  • Hong Kong: the Community Investment and Inclusion Fund
  • The ADB three pillars framework for poverty reduction: pro-poor sustainable economic growth; inclusive social development; and good governance.
  • interventions for poverty reduction can be short term; medium term; or long term
  • Inclusive social development: Human Capital, Population Policy, Gender and Development, Social Capital, Social Protection. Under social capital, ADB writes,
    • “When poverty is pronounced, social cohesion is often weak, and communities suffer from conflict, marginalization, and exclusion….. Social capital and a more inclusive society can be promoted through antidiscrimination legislation, land reform, legal recognition of user groups, and accessible systems of justice. Specific measures may be required ethnic minorities.”
    • World Bank: social capital refers to the institutions, relationships, and norms that shape the quality and quantity of a society’s social interactions. It is considered as a critical factor for poverty alleviation and sustainable human and economic development.
    • World Bank’ special web site on social capital.
  • In particular, the World Bank considers social capital as a significant factor for enhancing the quality, effectiveness and sustainability of Community-driven Development (CDD) operations.

24-26

Social Capital Implementation Framework (SCIF):

  • The five dimensions of social capital include: Groups and networks; Trust and Solidarity; Collective Action and Cooperation; Social Cohesion and Inclusion; and Information and Communication.
  • World Bank’s two major social capital related CDD projects in Asia, one in the Philippines and the other in Thailand
  • World Bank integrated social capital into its three key strategic areas of project operation:
    1. participation: local participation in project design, implementation and evaluation ensure that projects and policies make sense within the local context and fosters the support and ownership necessary to sustain the project once development workers are gone;
    2. policy: preserve, promote and invest in social capital, and fostering cross-sectoral partnerships for development; Promote social capital research and learning; and
    3. partnerships: a tri-sectoral partnership (the public, private and non-profit sectors) to a common goal of “win-win” benefits across a broad number of projects.

27

SOCIAL ENTERPRISE, SOCIAL CAPITAL AND SHOP

  • Private enterprise and social enterprise
  • SHOPs: income generating and enterprise activities, some governments’ social enterprise initiatives in poverty alleviation.
  • Social enterprise: income generating organizations operated like a private business but which serves a primary social purpose of supporting the rights and welfare of disadvantaged groups.

28-31

Affirmative government policies

  • Philippines:
    • Government allocates 10% of its purchasing budget for chairs and tables of public schools to cooperatives of persons with disabilities.
      Affirmative government policies
  • Taiwan Province of China:
    • mandatory employment quota system with a levy.
    • funds raised from the levy as wage subsidy.
    • income subsidy initial job placement up to around 36 months
    • government’s purchase budget
  • A SHOP from the Philippines
    • The cooperatives of PWDs
    • Role of the national cooperative body
    • Building positive political, social and business networks
    • A success story of a local cooperative
    • The government and TV campaigns
    • Challenges and issues, and ways forward
  • A SHOP from Taiwan Province of China
    • Background of the selected case
    • Business contracts with government, the case of special transport service
    • Sheltered workshop cum business
    • Networking with political, social and business leaders
    • Challenges and issues

32-34

REFLECTIONS FROM THE TWO CASES

  • Both share a common situation, no government funding.
  • Both share a common wish, to nurture a sustainable social enterprise which will in turn support the sustainable development of the mother bodies.
  • dynamic interaction among government affirmative policy, development agencies, NGO funding bodies, the private sector, with the SHOP as the key player bridging and linking all interested and concerned sectors
  • SHOPs’ active social networks and trust relationship built across all sectors.
  • The high moral value of social enterprises , a disadvantage?
  • Social capital investment: critical and strategic for SHOPs

35-38

A COMPREHENSIVE AND PROACTIVE APPROACH TO SUPPORT SOCIAL CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FOR SHOPS

  • At local and national levels
  • At the regional level
  • A Regional Tripartite Platform for Sustainable Development:
    • to study and improve on affirmative policies in support of social enterprises in relation to a rapidly changing global economy,
    • to identify the kind of businesses at the local level which SHOPs have a better chance of success in developing into social enterprises,
    • to support capacity building programmes for SHOPs at the regional level through provision of trainers and training packages, particularly from the business partners, which will best suit dynamic business operations,
    • to facilitate networking of SHOPs at national and local levels with national branches of multi-national corporations,
    • to facility the networking of not for profit development organizations supported by multi-national corporations with SHOPs in the development of social enterprises,

39

CONCLUSION

  • Opportunities in 2007 during the high-level intergovernmental meeting organized by ESCAP to review the BMF implementation and to adopt the BMF plus Five, a supplementary strategy for the later half of the Decade.

40

Thank you


Return to top


Copyright (c) 2006 Vision Office.
Last updated 10/11/06. Contact: info @ visionoffice.com